USPTO serial 78934589
SALUD Y CONFIANZA CON PINOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3843220Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SALUD Y CONFIANZA CON PINOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Catarina, N.L., MX
Santa Catarina, N.L., MX
Santa Catarina, N.L., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Petersen
SCOTT W PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT131 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET30TH FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAS ALEN, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAS ALEN, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAS ALEN, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SALUD Y CONFIANZA CON PINOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |