Drawing for THE STANLEY HOTEL

USPTO serial 78934644

THE STANLEY HOTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE STANLEY HOTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Beard

John L. Beard Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC1233 20th Street, N.W.Suite 501,Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate services, namely, brokerage of timeshares and fractional interests in real estate; management and leasing of timeshare and fractional ownership propertiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 2, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 4, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance