USPTO serial 78934649
MAPLE LEAF COOKING CORNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAPLE LEAF COOKING CORNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorelei G. Graham
LORELEI G GRAHAM MILLER THOMSON LLP100 STONE RD WSTE 301, ONTARIO AGRICENTREGUELPH, N1G 5L3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotion of goods and services via internet or any other mass media | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing information in the field of cooking, namely, time saving tips for cleaning | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning cooking questions and answers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting member-only contests in the field of cooking and conducting cooking competitions for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information in the field of food safety; computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online interactive discussions concerning cooking questions and answers | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing information in the field of cooking, namely, cooking instructions and recipes, time saving tips for cooking, meal planners | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing information in the field of food nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maple Leaf Consumer Foods Inc./Les Aliments de Consommation Maple Leaf Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maple Leaf Consumer Foods Inc./Les Aliments de Consommation Maple Leaf Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MAPLE LEAF COOKING CORNER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |