Drawing for TREE SQUEEZE

USPTO serial 78934715

TREE SQUEEZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREE SQUEEZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian S. Steinberger

BRIAN S STEINBERGER LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN S STEINBERGER PA101 BREVARD AVECOCOA, FL 32922-7904UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Decorative stands for wrapping about tree trunks and tree limbs for holding and displaying pots, planters, flowers, plants, bird seed and other objects off the groundACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 5, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance