USPTO serial 78934722
DEBUGLIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3921169Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEBUGLIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Kozak
Lori S. Kozak BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 Wilshire Boulevard, Seventh FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software development tools; computer software for use by software support engineers and developers for analyzing, testing, developing, troubleshooting and maintaining computer software and applications; computer software for use by software support engineers and developers for collaborating on software development, testing, troubleshooting, analysis and editing projects; computer software for use in memory management, managed execution via breakpoints, automatic and manual symbol management, collaborative development, testing and analysis, and remote development, testing and analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 9, 2010 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, nondownloadable software development tools; providing temporary use of online, nondownloadable software for use by software support engineers and developers for analyzing, testing, developing, troubleshooting and maintaining computer software and applications; providing temporary use of online, nondownloadable software for use by software support engineers and developers for collaborating on software development, testing, troubleshooting, analysis and editing projects; providing temporary use of online, nondownloadable software for use in memory management, managed execution via breakpoints, automatic and manual symbol management, collaborative development, testing and analysis, and remote development, testing and analysis; computer software development services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 9, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DebugLive.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DebugLive.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DebugLive.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DEBUGLIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 27, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |