Drawing for INSTANT DIALOG

USPTO serial 78934774

INSTANT DIALOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSTANT DIALOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracy L. Zawaski

TRACY L ZAWASKI RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing and operating of online chat rooms; transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest on a website; transmission of short message and text messages messaging and message receiving, sending and forwarding; electronic store-and-forward messaging; transmission of database information via telecommunications networks services; electronic data transmission; electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid telecommunication services all relating to the above servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, party and festival planning, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; education services, namely, workshops in the field of social interactions; entertainment services, namely, conducting parties for the purpose of dating and social introduction for adults; party planning; organizing exhibitions for social entertainment purposes; arranging meetings and seminars in the field of entertainment to be conducted via telecommunications or the InternetACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, information technology consultation, services providing information in the field of computer technology; computer consultation and advisory services; providing an on-line computer database in the field of social networking; electronic storages of data, information and of messages; Internet services, namely hosting digital content on the Internet ; online social networking services; information, advisory and consultancy services, all relating to the above services; computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 28, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 27, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance