Drawing for G

USPTO serial 78934823

G

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
I, DAVID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin Gelfand, Esq.

MARVIN GELFAND ESQ WEISSMANN WOLFF BERGMAN COLEMAN GRODIN &9665 WILSHIRE BLVD 9TH FLBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Organization storage products namely mesh bags made of nylon and canvasACTIVEFeb 9, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 4, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 3, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance