USPTO serial 78934885
TRUE THAI FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2007
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRUE THAI FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Jacob
Arthur Jacob Arthur Jacob25 East Salem Street, P.O. Box 686HACKENSACK, NJ 07602-0686UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ASIAN STYLE PREPARED FOODS; NAMELY, PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF NOODLES AND SAUCE, RICE AND SAUCE, AND NOODLES, SEASONINGS AND OILS; AND SATAY KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DIPPING SAUCE, MARINADE, SALAD DRESSING AND SKEWERS SOLD AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 5, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 6, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |