USPTO serial 78934897
MICVIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICVIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Nath
GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES PLLC112 S W STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microprocessors; decoders, namely, for television sets and video transmission apparatus; apparatus for entertainment electronics, namely, television receivers, audio and video apparatus, LCD large screen displays, video projectors and digital video recorders, radio receivers, satellite receivers, analog and digital recording and reproduction apparatus for sound and image and movie carriers, namely, DVD players, MP3 players, CD players, flash card players, digital video and audio players; apparatus for vehicle electronics, namely, radios for vehicles and audio and video playback devices; electric and electronic apparatus and components for telecommunication thereof, namely, integrated circuits and computer plug-in cards having electric and electronic circuitry and components mounted thereon; apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing image and sound, namely, video displays, projectors, video recorders and video disc and cassette players and video reproduction apparatus; data treating apparatus, namely, video and audio telecommunication data processors and computers; software, namely, control software to control and improve digital audio and video equipment sound and video quality; operating system software; downloadable software for operating systems and control software, namely, software to control and improve digital audio and video equipment sound and video quality; machine-readable data files and data bases in the fields of semiconductors and electronics; blank machine-readable data carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing a high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages; telecommunication consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software development; design and development of electronic devices for others, namely, semiconductor components, microprocessors, electric and electronic circuits, apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing image and sound; technical consultancy in relation to the production of semiconductors and related services; engineering consultancy in the field of computers; consultancy services for design and development of computer software; updating of computer software for others; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technology consultation and research in the field of telecommunications technology and the fields of computer hardware and software; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MICVIPER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |