USPTO serial 78935345
JUICEETEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUICEETEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wayland, MA
Wayland, MA
Sudbury, MA
QUERCEGEN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LLC
SUDBURY, MA
Other trademarks owned by QUERCEGEN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J. MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP.O. Box 7068Pasadena, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETETIC FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTAL DRINKS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; HOMEOPATHIC SUPPLEMENTS; MEAL REPLACEMENT AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENT DRINK MIXES; MEAL REPLACEMENT BARS; MEAL REPLACEMENT DRINKS; NUTRACEUTICALS FOR USE AS A DIETARY SUPPLEMENT; NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES FOR USE IN FOODS AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION; NUTRITIONAL DRINK MIX FOR USE AS A MEAL REPLACEMENT; SOY PROTEIN FOR USE AS A NUTRITIONAL INGREDIENT; MEDICATED CONFECTIONERY, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM; HERBAL TEA FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSES; MEDICATED BEVERAGES; NUTRITIONALLY FORTIFIED BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | BREWED MALT-BASED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF A BEER, PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING MALTED BEVERAGES; NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT JUICE BEVERAGES; AERATED WATERS, TABLE WATERS, MINERAL WATERS; FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT BEVERAGES, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, SPORTS DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, CARBONATED BEVERAGES AND SOY-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES; ENERGY DRINKS; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING FRUIT BEVERAGES, ENERGY DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, SPORTS BEVERAGES AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITH TEA FLAVOR; NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT BEVERAGES; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING MALTED BEVERAGES; NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT JUICE-BASED BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lines, Thomas C.
- Other trademarks owned by Lines, Thomas C.
- Other trademarks owned by QUERCEGEN PHARMA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by QUERCEGEN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named JUICEETEA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |