Drawing for G

USPTO serial 78935391

G

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with G?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MORTON J. ROSENBERG

MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES; MOTORIZED SCOOTERS; NON-MOTORIZED SCOOTERS; WATER SCOOTERS; MOTORCYCLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; MOTORCYCLE ENGINES; SNOWMOBILES; FOUR-WHEEL MOTORCYCLES; CARS; AUTOMOBILE ENGINES; LAND VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY, TRANSMISSIONS, WHEELS; BRAKES FOR LAND VEHICLES; BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES; DISC BRAKES FOR LAND, AIR, WATER VEHICLES; ELECTRIC DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; ELECTRIC CARS; STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR MOTORCYCLES; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES FOR LAND VEHICLES; LAND VEHICLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORACTIVEMar 27, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance