USPTO serial 78935589
SUPERLAWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERLAWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian Tannahill
Erik L. Walter Dworken & Bernstein Co. L.P.A.60 South Park PlacePainsville, OH 44077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Artificial turf; floor coverings, namely, carpets, carpet underlay and linoleum; floor coverings for covering a floor on which there stands playground equipment, namely, floor coverings made of a rubber material; mats, namely, door mats, bath mats and non-slip mats; sports related mats, namely, gymnastic and gymnasium mats and mats that may be used as a cricket pitch; carpets, namely, automobile carpets | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services featuring artificial turf, floor coverings, carpets, mats and adhesives | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |