Drawing for LIFESMART TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78935669

LIFESMART TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFESMART TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison G. Olmsted

Allison G. Olmsted HOWREY LLP2941 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVESUITE 200 & 300FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009suite of computer hardware and software features and enhancements for notebook computers which make the computer more rugged, durable, secure and reliable, provide better means of wired and wireless internet and mobile device to mobile device linking and provide security, features and enhancements comprising computer software for data encryption and enhanced wired and wireless internet and mobile device to mobile device linking, hard disk drive protection devices namely, hardware for isolating hard disk drive from damageable media, shock protection devices namely, computer component padding and insulation, spill-resistant keyboards, pc diagnostic tools namely, software for testing and repairing hardware and software problems, magnesium computer casing, locks, namely locking software enabling the user to lock specific devices to prevent unauthorized access to computer or copying of files and lock slots for external locks, top-of-the-line security software, namely execute disable bit software for blocking harmful code and viruses, sold together within a notebook computerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance