CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SEPISCHOOL

USPTO serial 78935738

SEPISCHOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEPISCHOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charlotta Ljungdahl

Charlotta Ljungdahl AIR LIQUIDE2700 POST OAK BLVD STE 1800HOUSTON, TX 77056-5797UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education and training services, namely tutoring to clients and distributors regarding the use and implementation of chemical products manufactured by the trademark ownerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance