USPTO serial 78935972
WHO SAID THERE'S NO "I" IN TEIM?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3756234Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2010
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHO SAID THERE'S NO "I" IN TEIM??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Bennett
Robert S. Bennett LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT S. BENNETT1404 3RD AVE APT 3SNEW YORK, NY 10021-0468UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods and sports equipment, namely, baseballs, baseball gloves, baseball bats, softballs, softball gloves; softball bats; basketballs; footballs; hockey sticks; hockey pucks; tennis rackets; tennis balls; alpine skis; cross country skis; snowboards; skateboards; water skis; wake boards; golf clubs and golf balls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 7, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Garbutt, Bernard J. III
- Other trademarks owned by Garbutt, Bernard J. III
- Other trademarks owned by Garbutt, Bernard J. III
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WHO SAID THERE'S NO "I" IN TEIM?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |