Drawing for WHAT EVERY TEACHER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT TEACHING READING

USPTO serial 78936048

WHAT EVERY TEACHER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT TEACHING READING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHAT EVERY TEACHER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT TEACHING READING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rocco S. Barrese

Rocco S Barrese DILWORTH & BARRESE, LLP1000 WOODBURY ROAD, SUITE 405WOODBURY, NY 11797UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of reading instruction and reading improvement and distributing reading materials and course materials for use in education in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 19, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance