Drawing for CLEARVISION

USPTO serial 78936081

CLEARVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn E. Knecht

CAROLYN E KNECHT MOTOROLA INC600 N US HWY 45LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048-5343UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephones, cellular telephones, radio telephones, pagers, two-way radios, radio transmitters, radio receivers, radio transceivers, personal digital assistants, electronic organizers, global positioning units and related accessories for the foregoing goods, namely, keyboards, headsets, microphones, speakers, carrying cases, battery chargers, batteries, power adapters and belt clips; computer software and programs used for transmission or reproducing or receiving of sound, images, video or data over a telecommunications network and for enhancing and facilitating use and access to computer networks and telephone networks; cameras, namely photographic cameras, digital cameras, motion picture cameras, video cameras, and audio and video players and hand held gaming machines, all for use with a self contained communications apparatus or physically separate but functionally integrated with a communication apparatus module.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance