USPTO serial 78936716
7SECONDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 7SECONDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Foster
THOMAS D. FOSTER TDFOSTER12760 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair detangler | ACTIVE | May 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |