USPTO serial 78937204
YOUNG AT HEART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUNG AT HEART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Holland
CHRISTOPHER A. HOLLAND SMITH GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLPSTE 3100, PROMENADE II1230 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309-3592Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary food supplements in the nature of a fruit-based beverage and a vegetable-based beverage; home meal replacement bars and shakes; nutritionally fortified beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Packaged meal kits comprised primarily of veal, beef, chicken, pork, potatoes, rice and vegetables; Salad dips; cheese dips, jams, potato salad, bean salad, lentils salad, egg salad, and tuna salad; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, cured meats; hamburgers; cold cuts, namely, bologna, salami, turkey and chicken; sausages; hot dogs; hot meats; fish; tuna; mackerel; salmon; processed nut mixes, trail mixes comprised of processed nuts and unprocessed nuts and salted nuts and unsalted nuts, roasted almonds, raisins, processed edible flax seeds; jelly; processed fruit; oils, namely, vegetable oil, olive oil, canola oil, sun flower oil, and safflower oil; spreads, namely, peanut spread, almond spread, and hazelnut spread; frozen fruits and vegetables; schnitzels, namely, chicken, beef, ham and tofu based schnitzel; canned vegetables; canned fruits; canned meats; canned fish; pickles; processed olives; milk; whipping cream; goat milk; sheep milk; cheese; cream cheese; cheddar cheese; mozzarella cheese; boccaccini cheese; hard and soft cheeses; yogurt, potato chips, and soy chips; eggs; tofus; nut based snack bars and nutrition bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Baked goods or other food products, namely, pita breads; breads; bagels; cracker; buns; muffins; cookies; cakes; pastries; pancakes; squares in the nature of brownies and rice crispy squares; nut based snack bars and nutrition bars; flat breads; fajitas; brownies; pizza; salad dressings; condiments, namely, ketchup, mustard, and relish; sauces, namely, barbecue sauce and honey mustard; soy sauces; prepared salads, namely, couscous salad, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen pizza; burritos; dried fruit; shelled nuts, processed cereals; processed corn; processed oat; processed wheat; processed spelt; sweet and salty processed cereals; pasta; bakery desserts; cakes; pies, namely, fruit pies, cheese pies, and meat; puddings; dessert cups in the nature of puddings; ice creams; frozen desserts, namely, flavored ices; flans; waffles; wafers; candy, namely, soft and hard candy; chocolates; ice cream; soups; rice; flour; sugar; potato flour; rice flour; and snacks, namely, rice cakes and chips, pretzels, and popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices and vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ozery Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named YOUNG AT HEART
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |