USPTO serial 78937676
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Moskowitz
Max Moskowitz Ostrolenk Faber LLP845 THIRD AVENUE, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10022United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail stores and on-line retail store services featuring handbags, bags, purses, wallets, belts and footwear made of leather, imitations of leather or natural or synthetic materials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |