USPTO serial 78938028
HOLD'EM BLACKJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLD'EM BLACKJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Johnston
SCOTT W JOHNSTON MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video games, computer video game software | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Card games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; leasing of casino games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games software which can be accessed through web site or by mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CryptoLogic Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HOLD'EM BLACKJACK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |