Drawing for PAIS

USPTO serial 78938369

PAIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K Kalan

INFORMATION ADVANTAGE, INC.445 E CHEYENNE MTN BLVDC-204COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in searching and analyzing databases of real property records and informationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 5, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 5, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 22, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance