USPTO serial 78938369
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
K Kalan
INFORMATION ADVANTAGE, INC.445 E CHEYENNE MTN BLVDC-204COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in searching and analyzing databases of real property records and information | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |