USPTO serial 78938387
Serial No. 78938387
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78938387?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy J. Thompson
Nancy J. Thompson Lewis and Roca LLP1663 Hwy 395 Suite 201minden, NV 89423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sport shirts, knit shirts, jackets, blazers, blouses, dresses, skirts, sweaters, t-shirts, shirts, tank-tops, shorts, pants, hats, caps, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweat suits, jogging suits, wind-resistant jackets, gloves, mittens, golf caps, golf shoes, golf socks, golf cleats, golf spikes, tennis wear, uniforms, swim wear, bathing suits, bikinis, swim suit cover-ups, bathing suit cover-ups, bath suit wraps, clogs, sandals, beach sandals, beach hats, beach wraps sun visors, swim caps, bathing caps, novelty headwear with attached wigs, head bands, wrist bands, underwear, bras, boxer shorts, leotards, tights, robes, and aprons | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate brokerage services, namely, rental and sale of apartments, condominium units, townhouses, residential houses, and commercial properties, including industrial buildings, office and retail space | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Coyote Springs Investment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Coyote Springs Investment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COYOTE SPRINGS LAND COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |