USPTO serial 78938440
FAILSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FAILSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newsura Insurance Services, Inc.
Roseville, CA
Newsura Insurance Services, Inc.
Roseville, CA
Newsura Insurance Services, Inc.
Roseville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. O'Banion
John P. O'Banion O'BANION & RITCHEY LLP400 Capitol MallSuite 1550SACRAMENTO, CA 95814Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Consultation services in the field of medical safety and loss prevention, namely, health care facility and medical practice safety assessments, health and safety compliance reviews, regulatory compliance reviews | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Newsura Insurance Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Newsura Insurance Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Newsura Insurance Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named FAILSAFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 22, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 21, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |