USPTO serial 78938625
J.D. LAURENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2008
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with J.D. LAURENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
Hooksett, NH
Other trademarks owned by Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
Hooksett, NH
Other trademarks owned by Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
Hooksett, NH
Other trademarks owned by Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meghan Van Leeuwen
Donald L. Smith DEVINE, MILLEMET & BRANCH111 Amherst StreetManchester, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Great State Beverages, Inc. DBA Classical Importers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named J.D. LAURENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |