Drawing for THE REAL DEAL

USPTO serial 78938871

THE REAL DEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE REAL DEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Krieger

John L. Krieger Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Ste. 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications, namely, magazines, in the field of martial arts; sunglassesACTIVE—
041Martial arts and mixed martial arts performances and exhibitions; organization and arrangement of martial arts competitions; arrangements for the showing of movies, shows, plays and musical performances all in the field of martial and mixed martial arts; movie showing, movie film production and movie film distribution in the field of martial and mixed martial arts; presentation of live show performances in the field of martial and mixed martial arts; presentation of musical performances; production of radio or television programs in the field of martial and mixed martial arts; organization, management and arrangement of boxing, martial and mixed marital arts, and wrestling matchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 3, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 5, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 9, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2008RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Oct 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 4, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance