CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MISS BEVERLY HILLS

USPTO serial 78939049

MISS BEVERLY HILLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISS BEVERLY HILLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisbeth Bosshart

LISBETH BOSSHART SHAUB & WILLIAMS LLP12121 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 205LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1164UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and online retail clothing and apparel storesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 17, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 16, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 30, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 20, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 9, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 21, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance