USPTO serial 78939146
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK R. BORGHESE
MARK R. BORGHESE WEIDE & MILLER, LTD7251 W. LAKE MEAD BLVD., SUITE 530BANK WEST BUILDING, 5TH FLOORLAS VAGAS, NV 89128| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | SCRAPERS; WINDOWS SCRAPERS; WALLPAPERS STRIPPERS; PAINT STRIPPERS; SCISSORS AND KNIVES FOR USE IN WALLPAPERING AND HOUSEHOLD DECORATING; STRIPPING KNIVES; FILLING KNIVES AND TROWELS; CHISEL KNIVES; PUTTY KNIVES; WALLPAPER TRIMMING KNIVES; WALLPAPER TRIMMING TOOLS; SEAM ROLLERS; SHAVE HOOKS; PAINT STIRRERS AND MIXERS; PAINT GUARDS; PAINT CAN HOOKS; WIRE BRUSHES; SANDERS; POLE SANDERS; STAPLE GUNDS; GUNS FOR THE EXTRUSION OF MASTIC; CAULKING GUNS; CAULKING TOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BRUSHES FOR APPLYING POLISH, STAIN OR VARNISH, PAINT BRUSHES; PAPER HANGING BRUSHES; BRUSHES FOR WALLPAPER PASTE; PAINT ROLLERS; PAINT ROLLER FRAMES; EXTENSION POLES FOR PAINT ROLLER FRAMES AND PAINT PADS; PAINT PADS, PAINT TRAYS, AND PAINT SCUTTLES; ARTISTS BRUSHES; ALL FOR USE IN PAINTING, DECORATING, PAPERHANGING AND TILING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |