Drawing for PREMIUM DUOTEX

USPTO serial 78939255

PREMIUM DUOTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PREMIUM DUOTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Horst M. Kasper

HORST M KASPER KASPER & LAUGHLIN13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Floor cleaning cloth, rags, mops, and dusters; cleaning cloths, cleaning cotton, cleaning mitts of fabric, cleaning pads, cleaning rags, cloth for wiping or dusting, washing cloths, polishing cloths, furniture dusters, window dusters, dusting gloves and unwoven fabric cosmetic wipesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 27, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 27, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 26, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 26, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 5, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 5, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 18, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance