USPTO serial 78939650
VIRTUAL FIELD EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATE, TARA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUAL FIELD EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK HARRISON Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Component part of pre-recorded digital video discs featuring education instruction in the field of teaching techniques, and which allows others to gain experience in a wide variety of fields through the observation of others in those same fields, and printed instructional materials in the same aforementioned fields sold together therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |