USPTO serial 78939844
BEARSVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEARSVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T. J. Weigell
JASON M VOGEL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Digital transmission of musical sound and video recordings; electronic transmission of audio and video content featuring music and musical based entertainment; digital transmission of musical sound and video recordings provided via a global computer network; electronic transmission of audio and video content featuring music and musical based entertainment provided via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing pre-recorded muisic, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; recording studio services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trust U/W of Albert B. Grossman
- Other trademarks owned by Trust U/W of Albert B. Grossman
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BEARSVILLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |