USPTO serial 78940125
ZERO-TOUCH FRAUD DETECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZERO-TOUCH FRAUD DETECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. McElwaine
John C. McElwaine Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP100 North Tryon Street42nd Floor, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for providing real-time and background fraud detection for transactions in and on various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols and authentication of users of, in and on such operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer software to detect suspicious, anomalous and unusual transaction and account behaviors in and on various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer programs for providing alerts and reports on potentially fraudulent transactions and suspicious, anomalous and unusual behaviors for and across various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer software for providing access control functions for and across various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer software for providing identification functions in the nature of electronic authentication for and across various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer software for providing policy enforcement functions for and across various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer software for scanning and analyzing electronic transactions for and across various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols; computer software for creating, storing, and using data in provision of multiple factors of identification and authentication of computer users and electronic devices for and across various operating environments, platforms, networks and network protocols | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |