USPTO serial 78940246
BUILT NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUILT NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Bisard
Leonard T. Nuara/Mark W. Bisard/Alan F. Kaufman Thacher Proffitt & Wood25 Deforest AvenueSummit, NJ 07901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Holders in the nature of specialty holsters and carrying cases, all specially adapted for handheld computers, laptop computers, wireless phones, pagers, cameras, video camcorders, personal digital assistants, portable communication devices, namely, two-way radios, two-way pagers and radio pagers, portable media players, namely, mp3 players and digital audio players, portable electronic recorders, namely digital audio and digital video recorders, and portable listening devices, namely, mp3 players and digital audio players; backpacks, briefcases, and luggage, all specially adapted for handheld computers, laptop computers, wireless phones, pagers, cameras, video camcorders, personal digital assistants, portable communication devices, namely, two-way radios, two-way pagers and radio pagers, portable media players, namely, mp3 players and digital audio players, portable electronic recorders, namely digital audio and digital video recorders, and portable listening devices, namely, mp3 players and digital audio players | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather carrying cases, hand bags, shoulder bags; travel bags; clutch bags; satchels; luggage; knapsacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Thermal insulated bottle tote bags and containers for food and beverages; thermal insulated tote bags with shock resistant properties for carrying wine bottles and other glass bottles containing beverages; wine bottle cradles; thermally insulated wrap for cans to keep contents cold or hot; containers not of precious metal for household or kitchen use; neoprene bottle holders; insulating neoprene sleeve holders for beverage cans; thermal insulated lunch bags, lunch boxes, lunch pails; thermal insulated wraps for containers and bottles to keep contents therein cold or hot; portable beverage coolers; household utensils namely corkscrews, strainers, spatulas, graters | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, coats, pants, t-shirts, blouses, hats, belts, shoes, vests, jackets, underwear, socks, sweaters, scarves, shorts, skirts, jeans, sweatshirts, bathing suits, nightwear, rainwear, footwear and formal wear, namely, men's suits and tuxedos; children's and infants' clothing, namely, bibs made from woven polyester fabric and synthetic rubber; overalls, t-shirts, pants, shorts; and baby bibs not made of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Built NY inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Built NY inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BUILT NEW YORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |