USPTO serial 78940293
ONECLICK CAPTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3482732Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2008
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONECLICK CAPTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Slapo
MICHAEL SLAPO FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP100 PARK AVESUITE 1500NEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Provision of access to data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 039 | Document delivery; electronic storage of files and documents; storage of electronic media, namely, images, text and audio data; storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, pick-up, and packing for shipment of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 040 | Digital compression of paper, documents, data, films, recordings, blueprints, drawings, x-rays, books, records and files; digital on-demand printing services of books and other documents; document destruction; electronic digitizing of photographs into a computer readable media; electronic imaging, scanning, digitizing, alteration and/or retouching of paper, documents, data, films, recordings, blueprints, drawings, x-rays, books, records and files; media duplication of data and digital information; photographic computer imaging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRM Information Management Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GRM Information Management Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ONECLICK CAPTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2008 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| May 21, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |