CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PVT

USPTO serial 78941037

PVT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3286335Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2007
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PVT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Dorvee, Esq.

Stephen M. Dorvee, Esq. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP171 17th Street, NWSuite 2100Atlanta, GA 30363

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laboratory automation systems, namely, systems which automate all important front-end and back-end features for laboratory use, comprised of centrifuges, tube type recognition via cap identification scanners, sample quality control machines, decapping, barcode printing and labelling machines, aliquoting, sorting, recapping and archiving machines; automated centrifuges for laboratory use featuring automatic loading and unloading of centrifugation racks and automatic centrifugation decision making machines per rack through tube type identification via cap recognition; laboratory sample quality classification and evaluation systems comprising machines for the automatic classification and evaluation of laboratory samples; automatic decapping systems for laboratory use, comprising machines for removal of closures on sample tubes and barcode alignment towards the rack opening; chemical sample quality classification and evaluation systems comprising machines for the automatic classification and evaluation of the quality and volume of chemical samples; automated tube recapping systems for laboratory use, comprising machines for closing, capping and foil wrapping of sample tubes; sample tube sorting systems for laboratory use featuring barcode scanning and archiving options, optional decapping modules and integrated tube type identification via cap recognition; sample sorting systems for laboratory use, barcode scanning systems, comprising machines for removal of closures on sample tubes, alignment of the barcode towards the rack opening, archiving, and integrated optional sample quality control, tube type identification via cap recognition and recapping modules; aliquoting systems for laboratory use; Camera and barcode scanning systems, comprising machines for removal of closures on sample tubes, alignment of the barcode towards the rack opening, sorting, aliquoting and archiving of samples, with optional sample quality control feature, tube type identification via cap recognition, liquid level detection and recapping modules; barcode, labeling and printing machines, all for laboratory use for the preparation and classification of samples; sample sorting machines for use with hematology tubes for laboratory use, featuring barcode scanning and archiving; automatic and manually configurable sample sorting machines for laboratory use; high throughput sample sorting machines for laboratory use, featuring a camera module and barcode scanning device and machines for the removal of closures on sample tubes, alignment of the barcode towards the rack opening, sorting and archiving of samples, with an optional recapping module; software, namely, data management and graphical user interface software for use with laboratory automation systems; barcode scanning and barcode validation softwareSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 20, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 23, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance