USPTO serial 78941097
VAERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
Stewart J. Bellus Collard and Roe1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment, namely, data processors and computers; computer software for use in designing and planning of installations for lighting, air conditioning, ventilating and heating; regulating and control devices and equipment for lighting installations and lights, namely, electric light dimmers and electric light switches, and touch panels; lighting ballasts and starters for glow-discharge lamps; electronic transformers; connectors and plug connectors for fiber optic cables; optical fiber cables of glass or plastic fibers for lighting; filters and barrier filters for optical devices, namely, color filters for use in lighting instruments, filters for photographic, cinematographic, video and performing arts equipment lighting; light outlets; lenses for focusing light, namely anti-reflective lenses | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Lighting installations, devices and equipment and lights, namely, electric lighting fixtures and lamps; fiber optic lighting installations, namely, fiber optic lighting fixtures used in conjunction with electrical illuminators; lamp casings, namely, housings for lighting fixtures; grilles for directing light, namely, lighting tracks and louvers; reflectors and covers for lights, namely, lamp reflectors, lamp shades and covers for light control and guidance diffusers, housings for lighting fixtures and lamps; lamp sockets for electric lights; lamp hanging supports, namely, suspension pendants for lamps; ventilating installations, devices and equipment, namely, ventilating exhaust fans, ventilation fans for commercial and industrial use, ventilation hoods for stoves, ventilators for commercial and industrial use; devices for directing and guiding air, namely, air blowers and air directing vanes; ventilation grills for directing air, namely, ventilating louvers; rollers for directing air, air conditioning installations, devices and equipment, namely, air conditioners, air filters for air condition units and valves for air conditioners; heating installations, devices and equipment, namely, electric heating fans, electric radiators for heating buildings and thermostatic valves | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Design and technical planning of installations for lighting, air conditioning, ventilation and heating, namely design of installation schematics; computer programming for others, namely programming of computing routines for electronic data processing equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |