USPTO serial 78941135
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Palisi
THOMAS M. PALISI LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ ET AL600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RECOVERY AUDITING SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | May 11, 2004 |
| 035 | RECOVERY AUDIT SERVICES, NAMELY, REVIEWING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, PURCHASING SYSTEMS AND MEDICAL CLAIMS BILLING SYSTEMS TO DETECT LOST PROFITS THROUGH OVERPAYMENTS, MISCALCULATIONS, MISSED DISCOUNTS, PRICING ERRORS, DUPLICATE PAYMENTS, INCORRECT INVOICES AND MISSED CREDITS, SALES AND USE TAX LIABILITIES AND PAYMENTS, CONTRACT COMPLIANCE, PROVIDING CONSULTATIVE PROCURE-TO-PAY PROCESS IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS, AND PROVIDING A WEBSITE FOR USE IN RECOVERY AUDITING, INCLUDING STORING, TRACKING, ANALYZING, COMMUNICATING, AND REPORTING ON INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE RECOVERY AUDIT SOURCES AND AUDIT EFFORTS | ACTIVE | May 11, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |