USPTO serial 78941229
COMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony Bortolin
TONY BORTOLIN DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST W. STE 301TORONTO, ONC M5H 2L7,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advisory, consultancy, research and information services in the fields of biotechnology, medical technology, nanotechnology, information and communications technology, analytical science, bicinformatics, and related public policy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |