USPTO serial 78941360
ROYAL UNDERGROUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROYAL UNDERGROUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
CATHERINE J HOLLAND KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; perfume; soaps; skin lotion; face lotion; body lotion; skin creams in liquid and in solid form; personal care products, namely, cosmetic astringents, deodorants and antiperspirants, makeup removing preparations, nail care preparations, nail polish, nail polish remover, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, sun block, sunscreen, sun tan oil, talcum powder; hair care products, namely, hair care preparations, hair color, hair color removers, hair conditioner, hair creams, hair dye, hair gel, hair mascara, hair mousse, hair oils, hair relaxers, hair shampoo, hair straightening preparations, hair spray, hair waving lotion, henna for cosmetic purposes; bath products, namely, aromatherapy oils, bath beads, bath crystals, bath gel, bath milk, bath oil, bath salts, bubble bath, foam bath, shower gel; skin care products, namely, after sun creams, after-shave, beauty creams, beauty masks, body cream, body glitter, body oil, body powder, body scrub, body sprays, body wash, cold cream, essential oils, facial cleansers, facial scrubs, facial masks, hand cream, hand lotions, hand soaps, henna for cosmetic purposes, lip balm, scented body spray, self-tanning preparations, skin clarifiers, skin toners | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Items made of precious metal, namely, drawer pulls, figurines, jewelry boxes, jewelry cases, key chains, key rings, ornaments, sculptures; clocks; watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, skirts, scarves, suits, sweaters, lingerie, nightwear, sleepwear, socks, swimwear, underwear, beachwear, gloves, hosiery; headwear; footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail stores featuring apparel, cosmetics, perfumes, personal care products, hair care products, bath products, jewelry, furniture, household items, kitchen items, bedding, linens, cookware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gray, Kelly
- Other trademarks owned by Gray, Kelly
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ROYAL UNDERGROUND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |