Drawing for FREEDOM FLANNEL

USPTO serial 78941511

FREEDOM FLANNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEDOM FLANNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024bedding namely, bed linens, bed sheets, bed blankets, pillow cases, home furnishings, namely, table linens; textile tablecloths, textile place mats and textile napkinsACTIVE—
025men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, night shirts, boxer shorts, pajamas, robes, scarves, headwear, slippersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 5, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance