Drawing for STANDARDS THAT DRIVE INNOVATION

USPTO serial 78941683

STANDARDS THAT DRIVE INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STANDARDS THAT DRIVE INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melinda B. Buurma

MELINDA B BUURMA HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PC39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publication, namely, calendars, brochures, and newsletters featuring information for and about manufacturers, suppliers, operators, and regulators in the gaming industry; gaming devicess, namely, gaming machines, slot machine, bingo machines, with or without video output; gaming device communication protocols in the nature of a feature of computer software used in communicating between gaming machines and peripheralsACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, calendars, brochures, and newsletters featuring information for and about manufacturers, suppliers, operators, and regulators in the gaming industry; booklets featuring gaming device communication protocolsACTIVE—
035Association services, namely, promoting the interests of manufacturers, suppliers, operators and regulators in the gaming industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance