USPTO serial 78941785

WWW.POKERWHOLE.COM WWW.POKERWHOLE.COM A WWW.POKERWHOLE.COM YOUR EROTIC GAMING DESTINATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jul 31, 2006
Status date: Apr 17, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WWW.POKERWHOLE.COM WWW.POKERWHOLE.COM A WWW.POKERWHOLE.COM YOUR EROTIC GAMING DESTINATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

Owner

PokerWhole, LLC
Chula Vista, CA
Other trademarks owned by PokerWhole, LLC
PokerWhole, LLC
Chula Vista, CA
Other trademarks owned by PokerWhole, LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles B. Witham

CHARLES B WITHAM SELTZER CAPLAN MCMAHON VITEK2100 SYMPHONY TWRS750 B STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Hats; Shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Shorts	ACTIVE	—
041	Providing on-line poker games	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 18, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jun 21, 2007	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 13, 2007	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
May 24, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 24, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 24, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 8, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 5, 2006	MDSM	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Aug 4, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance