USPTO serial 78942352
ORGANIC BOULEVARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGANIC BOULEVARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Papademas
KATHERINE PAPADEMAS LAW FIRM OF KATHERINE PAPADEMAS5330 N NASHVILLECHICAGO, IL 60656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Organic personal care products, namely, cosmetic creams for skin care, cosmetic preparations for body care, face creams for cosmetic use, hair care preparations, hair conditioners, hair gels, hair lotions, hair mousses, hair nourishers, hair rinses, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair styling gel, hair styling preparations, hair styling spray, lotions for face and body care, skin conditioners, skin creams, skin emollients, skin lotions, skin moisturizer, soaps, toners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Market Development Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Market Development Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ORGANIC BOULEVARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |