USPTO serial 78942506
SAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to detect, calculate and record erection and ejaculation times for use in the field of the diagnosis of sexual dysfunction | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical diagnostic apparatus, namely, apparatus for measuring and monitoring the frequency of vibrations, apparatus for measuring time, apparatus for measuring the duration of vibrations and for measuring pulses, all for use in the field of the diagnosis and treatment of sexual dysfunction including premature ejaculation; medical diagnostic sensors for measuring pulse; medical apparatus and instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of sexual dysfunction including premature ejaculation; medical apparatus and instruments for assessing and monitoring sexual dysfunction including premature ejaculation; medical apparatus and instruments for measuring the severity of sexual dysfunction including premature ejaculation; adult sexual aids, namely, vibrators; vibromassage apparatus, massage apparatus; medical apparatus and instruments for applying electrical currents to the skin for treating sexual dysfunction including premature ejaculation; devices for aiding masturbation, namely, pumps, rings, clamps, stimulators, vibrators, sleeves on vibrators sold together with massaging devices, masturbators; adult sex aids, namely, electrical appliances for massaging the body; condoms; parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |