USPTO serial 78942621
LAKE TAHOE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAKE TAHOE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Tahoe City, CA
Other trademarks owned by North Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
North Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Tahoe City, CA
Other trademarks owned by North Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
NORTH LAKE TAHOE RESORT ASSOCIATION
TAHOE CITY, CA
Other trademarks owned by NORTH LAKE TAHOE RESORT ASSOCIATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lara Pearson
LARA PEARSON LAW OFFICE OF LARA PEARSON LTDPMB 405774 MAYS BLVD NO 10INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Chamber of commerce services, namely, promoting business and tourism in the Lake Tahoe area | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 3, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by North Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by North Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH LAKE TAHOE RESORT ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LAKE TAHOE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |