Drawing for OUTPOST NETWORK SECURITY

USPTO serial 78942749

OUTPOST NETWORK SECURITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OUTPOST NETWORK SECURITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria Miroshnikova

MARINA GORINA LAW OFFICES EGOROV PUGINSKY AFANASIEV419CONESTOGA RDRADNOR, PA 19087-4811

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for network security purposes, antivirus protection and local security purposes for use on desktop, servers and portable computers, namely computer antivirus software, computer utility software, firewall software for preventing intrusion and hacking, computer anti-trojan horse and anti-spyware software, computer software for preventing network intrusion, computer software for blocking hostile computer code, computer software for protecting user privacy online, computer software for blocking unwanted web sites, computer software for blocking spam messages, computer software for interception, blocking, modifying and analyzing network activity, computer software for monitoring of network activity of the computer, and computer telecommunication software for use in transmitting and receiving information concerning computer viruses, spyware and trojan horses, computer security issues and updated versions of computer software via global computer networks; Centralized deployment, management (using different security policy for different endpoints), monitoring and updating of such softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 1, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 26, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 26, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 26, 2001MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance