USPTO serial 78942749
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Miroshnikova
MARINA GORINA LAW OFFICES EGOROV PUGINSKY AFANASIEV419CONESTOGA RDRADNOR, PA 19087-4811| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for network security purposes, antivirus protection and local security purposes for use on desktop, servers and portable computers, namely computer antivirus software, computer utility software, firewall software for preventing intrusion and hacking, computer anti-trojan horse and anti-spyware software, computer software for preventing network intrusion, computer software for blocking hostile computer code, computer software for protecting user privacy online, computer software for blocking unwanted web sites, computer software for blocking spam messages, computer software for interception, blocking, modifying and analyzing network activity, computer software for monitoring of network activity of the computer, and computer telecommunication software for use in transmitting and receiving information concerning computer viruses, spyware and trojan horses, computer security issues and updated versions of computer software via global computer networks; Centralized deployment, management (using different security policy for different endpoints), monitoring and updating of such software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2001 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |