Drawing for STERILSCOPE

USPTO serial 78943282

STERILSCOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STERILSCOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra A. Brockman-Lee

SANDRA A BROCKMAN-LEE PROSKAUER ROSE LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical endoscopes and medical optical inspection apparatus, namely endoscopes and optical inspection apparatus for medical use and replacement parts, accessories, and endoscope operation units therefore; Medical endoscopes or medical optical inspection apparatus for medical use capable of being autoclaved and replacement parts and accessories therefore; Medical endoscope and medical optical inspection apparatus for medical use and autoclaving unit therefore; Medical endoscope and medical optical inspection apparatus for medical use, autoclaving unit therefore and computer software for controlling the autoclaving process all sold as a unit.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 18, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 20, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 20, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance