USPTO serial 78943539
D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel R. Meyer
JOEL R MEYER DIGIMARC CORPORATION9405 SW GEMINI DRBEAVERTON, OR 97008-7192UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in producing, tracking and issuing drivers licenses; computer software for controlling the production and printing of identification and license documents; computer software for uploading identification and license information into a database of such information; computer software for scanning signatures and identification and license information; computer software for capturing facial and other images for identification and license documents; computer software for retrieving identification and licensing information from an on-line accessible database of such information; computer software for encryption or adding coded information to identification and license documents for reading the encrypted or encoded identification and license documents and for associating digital signatures with such identification and license documents; computer software for placing and recognizing hidden digital codes in physical and electronic media objects namely, still images, financial instruments, identification and license documents; computer software, cameras and computers used to link computers from such physical and electronic media objects based on hidden digital codes therein; computer software used for linking to electronic networks from coded digital information; computer software for encoding image signals with digital information and for decoding such digital information from such image signals; computer software for authenticating/validating identity documents; computer software for archiving and verifying the authenticity of credentials used as "breeder" documents to obtain an identity document; computer software for delivery and administration of identity and domain knowledge tests where questions are presented using text, graphics, animation, video or audio | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Services for preparation of identification cards namely drivers licenses; providing databases of fingerprint and facial recognition information for use by business, governmental agencies, military and law enforcement; providing databases for verifying the authenticity of credentials used as "breeder" documents; services for analyzing biometric and credentials databases for fraud prevention. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |