Drawing for OCD OPTIMAL CARTILAGE DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 78943787

OCD OPTIMAL CARTILAGE DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OCD OPTIMAL CARTILAGE DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia L. Stewart

CHARLES O'HARA428 WEST BRANNON ROADNICHOLASVILLE, KY 40356UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplement for animalsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 30, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 19, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance