USPTO serial 78943900
MOLECULAR BIOMETRICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3617895Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOLECULAR BIOMETRICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart E. Beck
Stuart E. Beck The Beck Law FirmSuite 7001500 Walnut StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19102-3504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Molecular diagnostic assays for use in medical diagnostic and monitoring applications and for drug discovery and development through pharmacodiagnostics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 5, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |